STEVE INSKEEP: When you think about the fact that this is a U.S. citizen, how are you thinking about the nature of the threat?

INSKEEP: This is a guy who was working for a security company and who therefore would’ve presumably had a perfectly reasonable excuse to own a firearm if he needed one. What law, if any, would have prevented him from getting one?

CLINTON: Well, if there had been a broader list that would’ve triggered the comprehensive background check required under Brady, that might’ve put a big red flag in the way of him purchasing the assault weapon plus the ammunition. Now, Florida laws do not regulate assault weapons or large capacity ammunition magazines. Doesn’t even require a permit to purchase a gun or register it or be licensed. So if we don’t have action on the federal level that would have set off the alert, it will be difficult to interrupt the plans of someone like this who clearly, by the time he went and purchased these weapons, was really already on the path to doing what he did in Orlando.


INSKEEP:: Do you want Americans to be voting this fall on the issues raised by a shooting like this?

CLINTON: Well I think it’s only fair that Americans take into account who can keep them safe. Who has the best ideas for defeating ISIS. And protecting us here at home. I think I have laid out what I believe would work. And I think that I have been clear that demonizing and demagoguing about Muslims is not only offensive it is dangerous and it plays into ISIS’s hands. And, you know, we know now that Donald Trump’s comments are actually being used to recruit and radicalize on the Internet. So I think it is appropriate when you look at the test that you have to meet to be commander-in-chief for Americans to be thoughtful about, you know, who has the experience and the approach that is best likely to work.


INSKEEP: Trump has picked up, though, an argument about defining the problem, defining the enemy. He said for example that President Obama should step down for not saying the phrase ‘radical Islam.’ The bigger question there, though, is do we know who the enemy is. Have we properly defined it so that we can marshal resources against them. Do you believe you have the enemy properly defined?

CLINTON: Trump as usual is obsessed with name calling. From my perspective it matters what we do, not what we say. It mattered that we got Bin Laden, not the name we called him. But if he is somehow suggesting that I won’t call this for what it is, he hasn’t been listening. I have clearly said we faced terrorist enemies who use Islam to justify slaughtering innocent people and we have to stop them and we will. We have to defeat radical jihadist terrorism. Whether you call it radical jihadism or radical Islamism, I think they mean the same thing. I’m happy to say either. But that’s not the point. The point is Trump goes way too far. He then demonizes Muslims — American Muslims. He wants to ban all Muslims from everywhere in the world, including the new mayor of London who has spoken about this from coming to our country.


INSKEEP: Well he has said he would make some exceptions.

CLINTON: Well isn’t that good of him. But it plays right into the hands of ISIS. And that’s why Americans need to know that Donald Trump’s words are being used in recruitment videos that ISIS is putting out. I think that is a very serious problem.

INSKEEP: Secretary Clinton, thanks very much for taking the time.